I'm the moderator of the aforementioned Commission for Women. I care deeply about empowering women to use their gifts in the full ministry of the Church. And yet, as I read and hear the various comments made during General Synod, and then read these articles about the wider world, I start to wonder whether what we need is something more than a Commission for Women. Maybe we need a Commission for Men, too. Contrary to popular opinion, I wouldn't be opposed to a ministry that helped men understand how best to use their gifts in the life of the church; I just don't want to create or chair it. Or maybe we actually need to throw out this single-gender advancement business and start a Commission for Working Out Our Gender and Sexuality Crap - because people, it seems we have some issues.
I haven't done a whole lot of factual research about it, but I've observed anecdotally some fairly disturbing trends amongst the men I know. As a result, I agree that a lot of men feel displaced by women's increasing independence and leadership, and uncertain about how to live into their own humanity when traditional masculinity is less valued than it once was. Some men react to that by becoming lazier, or subservient to the woman/women in their lives. Some others react by clinging to traditional ideas of masculine and feminine traits and roles (and reinforcing it with religion, which is where it becomes fun for me). The happiest men I know, the ones who seem most comfortable with themselves as humans and as men, are the ones who don't seem overly concerned with which role goes with which gender, and who have instead chosen to embrace the idea that people are unique and should do the things that fit their gifts, talents, and interests, regardless of their anatomy.
People tend to throw Scripture around when it comes to gender roles, but they seem to forget this one: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:28)." I don't really understand how people read that without getting the idea that Christ eradicates all outward distinctions between us and allows us to simply be who we are in Christ. And I wonder, in my idealistic moments, wouldn't it be a great thing if we could get over all of this finger pointing and telling each other what we are and aren't supposed to do, and just allow each other to figure out who we are called to be? But what do I know; I'm just one of those power-grabbing, emasculating, ungodly women.
5 comments:
Oh, Stacey, how I love to hear what is on your mind...and would second a motion for the formation of the "Commission for Working Out Our Gender and Sexuality Crap"!
We do, indeed, have a few issues in this area. Thanks for putting voice to some of them.
Bethany
Very thoughtful reflections Stacey. I have said for YEARS that I have some substantial questions about the existence of The Commission for Women within our denomination, for some of the reasons you stated. I too, care about all gender relationships and the ensuing issues that come from those. But what I believe may be the primary goal of The Commission for Women (and I may be wrong about what that is) is NOT well served by the existence of that Commission. It's no one's fault and it was created I believe with all good intentions and some wonderful people have been part of it. But. . .it significant ways, it exacerbates the dilemmas of gender relationhips.
Stacy,
What role does the context (salvation) of Galatians 3:28 play in your understanding of the text?
Jeremy
Well, I don't actually think the context is primarily about salvation, although it is related; it's about how we live our lives - no longer living under the custody of the law, but rather under faith through Christ. As children of God through Christ, united in one baptism, all of us are equally called to follow Christ and use our gifts in service to God and the world. I sense that you may have some more specific question or opinion in mind when you ask that, however.
Stacey,
You are correct, I was interested in your understanding of the context, as it helps me to better understand the way in which you use this text.
Thanks you,
Jeremy
Post a Comment